Search for: "DEFENDER SECURITY COMPANY"
Results 821 - 840
of 17,815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2023, 5:15 am
Defending against state or federal enforcement action involves challenges and risks that are different from those involved in defending directly against consumer claims. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 6:05 am
The dismissals occurred after the defendant company made additional disclosures and paid the plaintiffs’ lawyers a mootness fee. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 11:16 am
Federal District Court Ruling on Motion to Dismiss Finally, on Tuesday, September 11, 2018, a Brooklyn federal judge ruled that an action against a defendant that is alleged to have engaged in a fraudulent offering of virtual securities related to two Initial Coin Offerings could not be dismissed on the grounds that the digital tokens were not securities, but rather that the question of whether the tokens were securities was one that a jury would have to decide. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 1:58 pm
Companies and groups such as Riseup want to provide users with reliable, secure network services even when—in fact especially when—dealing with requests from law enforcement and lawyers to hand over private user information and logs. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 8:59 am
The executive needs buy-in from Congress, the U.S. public, and U.S. companies in its AI-related national security choices to maximize which companies will work with U.S. national security agencies, garner support from allies and non-committed states, and avoid future backlash against overly aggressive national security activities. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 3:54 am
The plaintiffs complaint alleged securities law violations against the holding company and five present and former directors and officers of the holding company or of the subsidiary. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:49 am
In their complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that the MGIC defendants had misrepresented MGIC’s underwriting practices; that the MGIC defendants had misrepresented the performance of mortgages the company had insured in 2005 and 2006; and that the defendants had misled investors about the extent of C-Bass’s margin calls in July 2007. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 8:24 am
Issue Presented: Did the plaintiffs, security holders of defendant Human Genome Sciences, Inc. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 12:11 pm
First, and beyond question, we need real device security. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:54 am
During 2007 and 2008, the company completed several securities offerings. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 11:38 pm
As Justice Ginsburg put it in her majority opinion in the Supreme Court’s 2013 Amgen decision, “the fraud-on-the-market premise is that the price of a security traded on an efficient market will reflect all of the publicly available information about a company; accordingly, a buyer of the security may be presumed to have relied on the information in purchasing the security. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 1:59 pm
” The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:26 am
In their consolidated amended complaint (here), the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants violated the securities laws through various disclosures and omissions related to the company’s securities lending program and its credit default swap portfolio. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:14 am
Facts of the Case In a recent federal case, the plaintiff was a woman whose late husband worked for the defendant coal company in Campbell and Anderson Counties. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:14 am
Facts of the Case In a recent federal case, the plaintiff was a woman whose late husband worked for the defendant coal company in Campbell and Anderson Counties. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:45 am
Securities Litigation, 2012 WL 2849660 (1st Cir. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:02 am
First and foremost, in both instances, the judges were reluctant to subject the defendant company’s pre-credit crisis disclosures to hindsight judgment. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm
As to thirty of the cases, the district court granted the dismissal motion as to thirty of the companies based upon the inadequacy of the derivative demand letters the plaintiff had sent to the issuer companies. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
(OTCBB: MSEH.OB) and a defendant in a civil securities case brought by the SEC, was convicted Jan. 31 in the Southern District of Florida in … Continue reading ? [read post]
District Court Retroactively Applies the SEC's 2005 Amendment to Rule 16b-3 Instead of Applying Levy
17 Oct 2006, 8:39 am
In this securities action, the shareholder of a parent company, Airgate, brought a claim against the principal shareholders (the defendants) of a wholly owned subsidiary called iPCS... [read post]
