Search for: "DOES 1-100"
Results 821 - 840
of 14,015
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2015, 7:38 am
” S.L. 2014-100, § 16C.1. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
There are four tips: 1. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 11:01 am
Branscome’s expert report concluded that the facility is within a 100-year floodplain and that it has at least a 1% chance of flooding. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 7:40 am
Rule 18a-1 is structured similarly to Rule 15c3-1.Minimum Capital RequirementsTentative Net Capital. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 8:14 am
Therefore claim 1 was already novel over D1 even without the disclaimer and there was "no legal basis for the introduction of the disclaimer (Art. 100(c) & Art. 123(2) & G1/03)". [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 1:01 am
The claim attempts to distinguish a 'click' touch from a 'panning' touch merely based on a duration of the touch measured in the device.The Board does not admit the main request (Art. 12(4), RPBA) because the applicant attempts to broaden claim 1 by unjustifiably returning to the claim 1 as filed. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:50 am
Second, just because the police officer writes down you were at fault does not mean you were 100% or even 1% at fault. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:32 am
It does not sound promising for the health and safety of nursing home residents. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 6:03 am
How does that work? [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:59 pm
This bill does not legalize marijuana usage, it just reduces the penalty - marijuana is still illegal in California. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 9:42 am
Does that help? [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 1:24 pm
In brief, the Court of Appeal held: (1) that the Unruh Act “does not require the alteration of standardized testing conditions to accommodate applicants with learning and reading-related disabilities,” see Turner, at 100-03, and (2) that California’s Disabled Persons Act “guarantees access to public places but does not require a modification of standardized testing procedures to accommodate learning and reading-related… [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 7:17 am
Damages 1 vs 3: The jury found infringement of three separate patents. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:58 am
And what does it mean for the 2012 election? [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:22 pm
[1] Ohio in The State of Ohio v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
XX, sec. 1). [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 6:23 am
QUESTION: Regarding the FHA 60% reserve funding requirement; just what does the 60% mean? [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:31 am
” It does matter. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 8:01 pm
He has a talent for what he does. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am
And Robb may think it going out on a limb, but I for one have complete confidence that the State of Arizona will be able to figure out what its own constitution does and does not allow. [read post]
