Search for: "DOUGLAS v. DOUGLAS"
Results 821 - 840
of 4,579
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2019, 2:21 am
In Wesley v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Irvin v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
In Booker v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
[The Structure of NFIB v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 9:23 am
(citing to McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Reed v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm
Douglas retired, giving President Ford an opportunity to fill a vacancy. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 6:57 pm
Douglas, who had served for over 36 years. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 12:14 pm
Estamos desalentados por la violencia que algunos grupos han manifestado, investigaremos y enjuiciaremos a cualquier persona que haya violado la ley federal, con todo el peso de la ley”, dijo Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez, Fiscal Federal para el Distrito de Puerto Rico. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 2:50 pm
Harper v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
., on Friday, July 5, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Dual-class stock, ESG, Institutional Investors, Lyft, Shareholder voting, Uber Director Independence and Oversight Obligation in Marchand v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
Miyagi v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Douglas. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:30 am
Apply the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:39 am
Katz, appellee, acting as substitute trustee, sold two properties owned by Douglas C. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Ferid Okic v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Murray v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 2:56 am
Laws banning truthful business speech about lawful conduct should trip First Amendment review [Ilya Shapiro on Cato amicus brief in Seeberger v. [read post]
