Search for: "Davis v. People"
Results 821 - 840
of 2,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2010, 8:22 pm
The California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 9:56 am
App. 2010), quoting Davis v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:43 pm
See also People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 2:57 pm
The Court has also found that Title IX requires schools to reasonably address sexual harassment by both teachers and students (Davis v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Supreme Court decision in Terry v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:15 pm
Davis and Jacob E. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Assume that in California v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:10 pm
Davis, 128 Md. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 8:36 am
Davis (D), Luis V. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:01 am
” [Institute for Justice “Short Circuit” on Davis v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:22 am
Chacón, a law professor at the University of California, Davis, "is fairly intrusive. [read post]
7 May 2023, 5:55 am
Shields and United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Davis Wright Tremaine Blog-Proud No problem finding the blogs here. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:00 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:31 pm
And appellate courts have repeatedly rejected challenges to these arbitrarily time limits (see People v Jean, 75 NY2d 744 [trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting counsel questioning to 15 minutes in first two rounds and 10 minutes in third round of voir dire]; People v Davis, 166 AD2d 453 [2d Dept], lv denied 76 NY2d 985 [1990] [15 minute restriction in first round followed by 10 minutes in second and third rounds not an abuse of… [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 8:36 am
" (People v Selassie, 140 Misc.2d 616, 619 [NY Sup Ct Bronx County 1988].) [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:17 am
The critical decision was, I think, Davis. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
If yes, the law is little changed as a practical matter, and the same people will be convicted, by and large. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]