Search for: "District of Columbia Government, Appeal of" Results 821 - 840 of 3,630
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The ruling marked the second time a District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals panel essentially voided a subpoena the House issued last year to Donald McGahn demanding the former White House counsel testify about his dealings with President Trump related to the investigation into alleged ties between the Trump campaign and Russia. [read post]
Sullivan’s decision was appealed to a panel of three judges in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, who ordered in a 2-1 decision that the case be dismissed per the DOJ’s request. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:13 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Yet two provisions of the Constitution empower Congress to create local offices for the District of Columbia and for Puerto Rico and the Territories. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Appeals Court Backs Greater Disclosure of ‘Dark Money’ Donors Politico – Josh Gerstein | Published: 8/21/2020 The District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a ruling that found the FEC’s donor-disclosure regulations regarding groups that spend money on independent expenditures – ads that expressly support or oppose political candidates – were too weak to comply with federal law. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 8:44 pm by ernst
Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
Shortly afterward, the BCSC issued Beach Place Ventures Ltd. v British Columbia (Employment Standards Tribunal), 2020 BCSC 327 (“Beach Place”). [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:18 pm by Matthew B. Kaplan
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals is the highest “state” court in the District of Columbia. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Jackson said the government had failed to make a convincing case showing the messages between White House aide Robert Blair and Office of Management and Budget official Michael Duffey were eligible for protection under legal privileges protecting the development of presidential advice or decisions made by other government officials. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 8:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
District of Columbia, its landmark ruling in 2008 that held for the first time that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to gun ownership. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Unknown
Drum makes much of the fact that the trust fund “is nothing but a bunch of government bonds. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 1:31 pm by Saira Hussain
The government appealed on this issue, and we cross-appealed on the issue of whether border device searches actually require a warrant. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:19 am by William Ford
District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed House Republicans’ lawsuit seeking to enjoin the use of the House of Representatives’s proxy voting system. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Dissent: We shouldn't even be hearing this appeal because the district court's denial of the dental board's motion to dismiss wasn't a final appealable order. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 6:45 am by INFORRM
The State of Arizona, an intervenor in the case, appealed the decision of the District Court of Arizona to grant Mr. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled the House has legal standing to use the courts to compel McGahn to appear in response to a Judiciary Committee subpoena. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 10:44 am by Rachel Bercovitz, Charlotte Butash
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting en banc, decided Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Consider, for instance, a resident of Virginia, which participates in a reciprocity agreement with the District of Columbia, where the taxpayer’s office is located. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:51 pm by Andrew Hamm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that Title VII applies only to civilian employees, not uniformed servicemembers such as the petitioner. [read post]