Search for: "District of Columbia v. Trump"
Results 821 - 840
of 906
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2019, 7:44 am
(Trump v. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 4:15 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a preliminary injunction to immediately stop the State Department from relying on the Coronavirus proclamations to suspend visa adjudications for those -physically residing in the Schengen countries, the UK, Ireland, China, Iran, and Brazil. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm
Indeed, a far better predictor of a justice’s vote is the justice’s ideology, rather than whether a justice uses a methodology like originalism or not to decide a case (think of Scalia and Justice John Paul Stevens in the District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In Trump v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
It accepts that the different policy goal, articulated in the Supreme Court’s Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
Columbia Records v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:00 pm
As of this writing, 33 states and the District of Columbia have passed laws legalizing marijuana in some form. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:02 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm
See District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:45 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:12 am
” The New York Times explained, “Two years ago, in Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
The 31 states and the District of Columbia that expanded their Medicaid programs would continue to receive enhanced federal funding until 2020. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
” The Supreme Court agreed to review the Biden Administration’s termination of the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols program, also known as the “Remain in Mexico” program, during its current term. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
” The New York Times explained, “Two years ago, in Wyeth v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 4:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which has taken a narrow view of the legal rights of the detainees. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 6:44 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit — during Burger’s clerk selection process. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:17 am
" The New York Times explained, "Two years ago, in Wyeth v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
