Search for: "Doe v. Queen" Results 821 - 840 of 1,310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2023, 4:31 am by Peter J. Sluka
  In BCL 1104-a cases, the Court does have the power to compel a buyout, even between 50/50 shareholders (see Zulkofske v Zulkofske, 2012 NY Slip Op 51210(U) [Suffolk Co. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm by Jimmy Verner
Frank D., 858 N.Y.S.2d 864 (Queens County Family Court 2008). [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am by SHG
 Under these principles, “what [Elonis) thinks” does matter. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am by Marie Louise
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica)… [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:09 am by Peter Mahler
Minority Member’s Alleged Exclusion From LLC’s Business Operation Does Not Establish Grounds for Judicial Dissolution Matter of Nunziata (Dinunzlu Group, LLC), Short Form Order, Index No. 4577/13 (Sup Ct Queens County July 25, 2013). [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:09 pm by INFORRM
AMM v HXW [2010] EWHC 2457 (QB) – 7 Oct 2010. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
Even assuming the dissolution proceeding can be considered pending, he wrote, “the Queens [dissolution] proceeding does not involve the same parties nor does it involve the same causes of action. [read post]