Search for: "Doe v. United States"
Results 821 - 840
of 40,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2008, 5:21 am
Although the First Circuit does not cover this aspect in its recent decision in the United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 10:08 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recently issued an opinion in Torres v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 12:26 pm
United States, the Federal Circuit held that a pharmaceutical manufactured in the United States qualified for sale, under the TAA, to the Department of Veterans Affairs even though the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) came from a non-designated country, India. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:20 am
As we most recently discussed, on a remand from the United States Supreme... [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 8:43 pm
United States could become a dead letter. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
Indeed, this admonition sheds light on the Supreme Court’s unsigned order from December in In Re United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:34 am
But it does seem unjust. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am
So, despite state court precedent, albeit from an intermediate court, holding that ABDW does not have two separate branches proved by separate elements, the First Circuit concluded that ABDW is divisible and thus does have two separate branches, with two different sets of elements. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am
So, despite state court precedent, albeit from an intermediate court, holding that ABDW does not have two separate branches proved by separate elements, the First Circuit concluded that ABDW is divisible and thus does have two separate branches, with two different sets of elements. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:34 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 2:06 am
Additionally, the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article Twelve of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights guarantees a defendant’s right to confront a witness at trial. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:04 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
Roper, 445 U.S. 326 (1980) and United States Parole Comm’n v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:01 am
State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:26 am
According to this Appeals Chamber decision in the case of Prosecutor v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:48 am
It does not afford the protection of statutory law (like Senator Specter's bill, the Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2006) or decisional law (like United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:17 pm
Labor RLA; preemption The Railway Labor Act does not completely preempt retaliatory-discharge claims under state law. [read post]
