Search for: "Does 1-1000" Results 821 - 840 of 1,488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This decision deals with an appeal following the refusal of an application by the Examining Division, based on A 54 and A 52(4).Claims 1, 24, 27, and 33 before the Board read :1. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Local police officers in New York State require a warrant to arrest an immigrant solely to transfer custody to federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement authoritiesPeople ex rel. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Pseudonymity can also cause difficulties in the fact-finding process, especially as the case gets closer to trial. [1.] [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Derrick George
You may be within 1000 feet of a school zone. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 9:30 pm
Went for It, 515 U.S. 618 (1995)[1]; Ficker v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The question was: what does the Article suggest is the significance of these dual roles? [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Does it matter if you represent 1 out of 3 as 33%? [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:24 am by Brian Cuban
  By allowing these groups whether they number 1 or 1000, Facebook is not promoting open discussion of  a controversial issue. [read post]
10 May 2009, 4:33 pm
  By allowing these groups whether they number 1 or 1000, Facebook is not promoting open discussion of   a controversial issue. [read post]
8 Apr 2025, 8:30 am by Above the Law
 Suddenly, I’m reliving my 1-L nightmare – the time I got called on in criminal law and froze. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 11:28 am by Jeffrey J. Randa
Anyway, in that case I am still usually able to have the Prosecutor drop the charge from a DWLS 2nd Offense (with the 1-year in Jail maximum and the up-to $1000 fine) to a DWLS 1st Offense (with a maximum Jail term of up 93 days and a maximum possible fine of up to $500). [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Secondly, s.1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013 means that claimants now have to prove that the publication caused, or was likely to cause, serious harm to their reputation. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 8:32 am by Jeffrey Randa
Getting busted while out on a boat and peeing off the side is one thing, and that does happen. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:26 pm
Does this prove that CO2 doesn't cause global warming? [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Does it matter if the provision affects 10 people or 1000 people? [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
How does your exemption deal with both, or does it? [read post]