Search for: "Does 1-25 inclusive" Results 821 - 840 of 1,151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2015, 5:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In an interesting May 1, 2015 memo (here), Thomas S. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
  Defendants argued that (1) they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law because plaintiffs’ warnings claim was preempted, under principles of implied conflict preemption; and 2) plaintiffs failed to prove causation because their causation expert was unqualified to render his causation opinions. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
First, the statutory limit on basic child support does not reflect current economic reality. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 10:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[vi]     But the potential price for opening a link that does not appear to be obviously suspicious can be breathtakingly high. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:08 am by Jeff Gittins
Jones case (see H.B. 25 above) failed in the last three sessions. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Michael Froomkin
What obligation does the Commission have to consider diversity and inclusion when making decisions that impact the school and larger community? [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:21 pm by Georgialee Lang
There were delivered to the court yesterday, or the day before, five large lever arch bundles of documents, which comprise over 2,000 pages, inclusive of the respective skeleton arguments, which are each just under 25 pages. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
I strove to achieve what Professors Pauwelyn, Wessel and Wouters describe as “thick stakeholder consensus,” in contrast to the “thin state consent” that so often emerges from intergovernmental negotiations.1 And I then hoped to leverage that consensus into “endorsement” by the UN Human Rights Council, adding to the GPs’ authoritative stature, helping to achieve their uptake by other international standard setting bodies, and embedding them in the… [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott & Kindermann
This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act [ICCTA] (49 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
The meaning of “treatment” Although s 1 of the Act does not use the word “treatment”, it is clear that the treatment to which s 4 refers is the termination of pregnancy under s 1. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 12:28 pm by Ken Krupat
  In case you missed any of these, you might find them interesting: 1. [read post]