Search for: "Does 1-39" Results 821 - 840 of 5,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2012, 8:38 am by Jeralyn
This error wasn't a mere technicality and it sure doesn't seem to be an oversight. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 8:27 am by Jeralyn
But I just read CNN's transcript (parts 1, 2 and 3) (again thanks to Tom for the links.) [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:03 am by paperstreet
We reach this holding by concluding that (1) Doe’s decryption and production of the contents of the drives would be testimonial, not merely a physical act; and (2) the explicit and implicit factual communications associated with the decryption and production are not foregone conclusions. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 3:10 pm
The IPKat didn't see this one coming because it isn't really an IP case at all -- though it seems to him that it does have repercussions for IP in a big way. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:02 am
Does it really matter what "intellectual property" is? [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 5:04 am
See also Doe v Poritz, 142 N.J. 1, 74 (1995); R. 2:11-3(e)(2). [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 5:15 pm
The highlights of the analysis are the court's conclusion that requiring the hospital to donate its services does not adversely impact the hospital's bottom line. [read post]
   The CARES Act does not address whether a state has the authority to adjust PUC for employees who are considered “partially unemployed” under state law. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:34 am
Rule 9(G)(1)(b)(vi)-(vii) (which reference, among others, I.C. 31-39-1-1 and -2).Here is IC 31-39-1-1 and 2. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:27 pm
The state charged her with a Class 1 drug offense, carrying a presumptive penalty of 86 months in prison, because the water weighed 37 grams, over the 25 gram threshold. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:51 pm by Mark Bennett
Nor is the additional ridicule that Rakofsky gets every time he does something to perpetuate his ridiculous lawsuit inappropriate. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:52 am
  California law does not allow anyone other than you to swing a hammer to drive a nail to rebuild your house if they're not licensed. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:53 pm
  If the chances of an accident are 1% , then you're talking about a $100 fine. [read post]