Search for: "Does 1-58"
Results 821 - 840
of 2,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm
It is irrelevant to the main proceedings that the Member State concerned has not yet transposed Directive 2006/24, despite the period for doing so having expired; Directives 2002/58 ... [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 11:45 am
Co., 985 So.2d 56, 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:18 pm
Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 58-59 (1985). [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:22 pm
The act is effective October 1, 2020. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:51 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:07 am
Does not think there is distinction between exempt advisers and registered advisers with respect to disclosure information on the ADV. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:02 am
Slip op. at 58. [read post]
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Seeks Increased Oversight Over Intrastate Natural Gas Pipelines
5 Jun 2007, 7:22 am
No. 109-58, 119 Stat. 594 (2005), Section 316. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 12:54 pm
The second part of the action, the actio pauliana, does not fit within in rem jurisdiction either. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 7:36 am
What does it feel like winning the lottery? [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 11:00 am
A 58 percent majority say they approve of Mueller’s handling of the investigation while 28 percent say they disapprove, the Post-ABC poll finds. [read post]
16 May 2019, 5:00 am
The results show that the public does not consider this a closed case. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:59 am
Melvin, 103 A.3d 1, 58 (Pa. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 9:21 am
Again, no one should (or presumably does) attend law school expecting only short-term contract employment. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:48 am
” Similarly, the act of intercepting a cookie may fall foul of the Electronic Privacy Directive (2002/58/EC), which clearly states in art. 5 that: “1. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:03 am
Walters, 58 M.J. 391, 395 (U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
It does not matter that the person did a great job. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The Second Circuit therefore certified a question to this Court: "Does the 'special duty' requirement—that, to sustain liability in negligence against a municipality, the plaintiff must show that the duty breached is greater than that owed to the public generally—apply to claims of injury inflicted through municipal negligence, or does it apply only when the municipality's negligence lies in its failure to protect the plaintiff from an injury… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The Second Circuit therefore certified a question to this Court: "Does the 'special duty' requirement—that, to sustain liability in negligence against a municipality, the plaintiff must show that the duty breached is greater than that owed to the public generally—apply to claims of injury inflicted through municipal negligence, or does it apply only when the municipality's negligence lies in its failure to protect the plaintiff from an injury… [read post]
