Search for: "Does 1-88" Results 821 - 840 of 2,127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2017, 3:09 am by Xandra Kramer
It concludes that the desirability of an opt-in system for foreign class members does not automatically leads to the conclusion that an opt-out regime contradicts Belgium’s international public order (§§ 84-88). [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
However, this does not make the above adverse effect any more acceptable. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Thus, this case does not fall outside the scope of the antidiscrimination statutes merely because plaintiff previously worked for Mobile Life. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Thus, this case does not fall outside the scope of the antidiscrimination statutes merely because plaintiff previously worked for Mobile Life. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
Additionally, it underscores that judicial findings of fact must be based upon all of the evidence.Joint authorship – the law (now succinctly summarised at [53])The court considered the well-established elements of joint authorship under s.10(1) CDPA 1988 in turn: (1) collaboration; (2) authorship; (3) contribution and (4) non-distinctness of contribution, although the focus was on the first three.1. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 9:25 pm
If you have a closed case that was closed on or before May 24, 2007, you must therefore have your bill submitted no later than Monday.What does that mean? [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
On both a federal and a state level, imposing a VMT tax does require lawmakers to make some hard decisions on trade-offs. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:10 am by Orin Kerr
My next post will address the costs, and it will then then compare the two. 1. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 2:51 pm by Lee E. Berlik
Evening Star Newspaper Co., 424 A.2d 78, 88 (D.C. 1980)) and opinions are not actionable anyway. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 12:00 pm
This has no basis in the Convention and contravenes conventional patentability criteria; referring e.g. to mathematical methods and to discoveries, the Enlarged Board of Appeal said in decision G 2/88 (supra), Reasons No. 8:"[...], as was recognised in Decision T 208/84 [...] [read post]