Search for: "Driver v. State"
Results 821 - 840
of 10,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2010, 1:04 pm
In my opinion it is stated briefly and accurately in the following passage in the judgment of Aylesworth J.A., concurred in by Robertson C.J.O., in Woodward v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 3:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 8:17 pm
The driver of the CR-V was rushed to Scripps Mercy Hospital for treatment of major injuries. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:14 am
In Bess v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:16 am
In a 2-1 decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals recently ruled that a certificate mailed to a state driver, notifying him of his suspended license, is "testimonial" as that term is used in the constitution thus, the Secretary of State must produce it's clerk at a trial for driving on a suspended license.The case, People v Nunley, arose in a district court in Washtenaw County. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:55 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court granted Wednesday the state’s petition for a writ of supersedeas to stay enforcement of the court of appeals’ judgment in State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 10:35 pm
Hughes v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 7:27 am
(See Rose v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:21 pm
In the pending cases United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
N.D.Okla.: Misinformation, inconsistencies, and lack of memory about travel plans was essentially RS
9 Feb 2011, 12:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:36 am
In Primo v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:09 am
That sensitive personal information, which includes photographs of the vehicle and sometimes its driver and passengers, is stored in a database. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 9:00 am
In Nava v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:05 pm
See Cicairos v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:55 am
United States v. [read post]
