Search for: "Dukes v. Dukes"
Results 821 - 840
of 3,511
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2005, 9:39 am
In Garcetti v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:12 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Monday in Morse v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 3:10 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] handed down decisions in three cases Wednesday, including Burgess v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:10 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF] Monday in Kentucky v. [read post]
20 Apr 2005, 12:01 am
In the first, Merck KGaA v. [read post]
25 Apr 2006, 7:39 pm
In Dixon v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 12:20 pm
What would Svatý Václav say to us, 1,080 years after his famous walk? [read post]
24 Apr 2006, 6:59 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday heard oral arguments in Brigham County v. [read post]
29 Jun 2006, 10:10 am
Arizona [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST report] that the state's approach does not violate constitutional due process. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 5:13 am
In Gonzales v. [read post]
18 Jan 2006, 2:18 am
In a unanimous decision in Ayotte v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 3:13 am
In Schriro v. [read post]
5 Dec 2004, 11:05 pm
The US Supreme Court will hear 10 AM ET oral arguments in Wilkinson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 10:22 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday handed down decisions in five cases, including Randall v. [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 10:55 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] issued two decisions Tuesday, including a ruling in Gonzales v. [read post]
18 Jan 2005, 8:21 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] heard arguments Tuesday in Rompilla v. [read post]
6 Dec 2005, 7:13 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday heard oral arguments [recorded audio, via C-SPAN] in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
29 Jun 2006, 10:12 am
Rumsfeld [Duke Law case backgrounder; JURIST news archive], that President Bush did not have authority to establish the commissions as constituted. [read post]
12 Jan 2005, 3:04 am
In Jama v. [read post]
30 Mar 2005, 4:53 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments Wednesday in Wilkinson v. [read post]
