Search for: "English v. State" Results 821 - 840 of 6,446
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2017, 6:01 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
"The aforesaid post also neatly summarises the legal position under the English and the Singaporean laws. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:51 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The appellants’ first alternative, which involves leaving the law as stated in OBG but without a dealing requirement, would dispense with the control mechanism which the House of Lords considered to be both necessary and desirable. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:13 am
Miranda rights suffer another setback in the United States Supreme Court case of Berghuis v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
“The justices tackle partisan gerrymandering again: In Plain English” [Amy Howe, SCOTUSBlog, earlier on Gill v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am by DARRYL HUTCHEON, MATRIX
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:24 am by William A. Ruskin
The “public trust” doctrine is a legal principle derived from English Common Law. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:54 pm by Jon
Constitution should be taken from lay English of 1787, or from legal English. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
In the event that extradition is denied on that basis, Article 3(2) requires the Requested State to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution if the Requesting State so requests and if the laws of the Requested State so allow. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:32 am by Hollis Kelly
Tugushev v (1) Orlov, (2) Roth, (3) Petric [2019] EWHC 645 (Comm) is a case which forms part of a bitter and high-profile battle between two Russian businessmen, the Claimant, Alexander Tugushev, and the First Defendant, Vitaly Orlov, alongside two of Mr Orlov’s associates, in relation to the Norebo Group, which is a corporate group which operates an international fishing business largely under Russian state fishing quotas. [read post]