Search for: "FORD v. UNITED STATES" Results 821 - 840 of 1,112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm by Marie Louise
Baby you CA drive my KA General Court judgment in Ford Motor Company v OHIM, Alkar Automotive, SA. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am by Marie Louise
– FCAFC decision in Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd v Overliese (IP Whiteboard)   Caribbean Carribean IP: Establishing an arbitral tribunal for the region (IP Watch) Canada Petition launched in opposition to CETA (Michael Geist) Clerical error in the Intellectual Property Office: Repligen Corp. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am by Layla Kuhl
  The Court of Appeals disposed of this argument by stating that Ford implicitly agreed to allow the arbitrators to decide the makeup of the FACTS Contract and adjudicate plaintiffs’ claims arising thereunder because of Ford moved for summary disposition to have all of plaintiffs’ claims resolved via binding arbitration. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:13 am by Jeff Gamso
  He alone believed (see United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:14 am by SHG
The Supreme Court's decision in Snyder v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:46 pm by Marcia Oddi
Ford Motor Company, Justice Dickson writes:The United States District... [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:48 pm by almaraz
United States * Former President of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund * Counsel to the Warren Commission Mr. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am by Christa Culver
United StatesDocket: 10-341Issue(s): (1) Whether the Federal Circuit erred by creating a defense to breach of the implied contractual duties under the sovereign acts doctrine that is at odds with the two-part test established by this Court in United States v. [read post]