Search for: "FOSTER v. STATE" Results 821 - 840 of 3,723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm by Kathryn Fort
In fact, the interpretation about how ICWA is a balancing statute between two sovereigns, the state and the tribe may not be all that persuasive to the Court. [read post]
26 May 2016, 5:15 am by SHG
In the afterglow of the Supreme Court’s decision in Foster v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
What legal principles connect publicity for the 17 year-old Charlie Pearce (born 3 July 2000), a double rapist and attempt murderer (R v Pearce (Press Restrictions) Haddon-Cave J (7 December 2017)) and privacy for a stalking mother who, with her cohabitant (‘Mr JM’) tried to disrupt her 10 year-old daughter T’s foster placement (Re T (A Child) [2017] EWCA Civ 1889 (23 November 2017)). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
In the second case, Kaley v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 7:29 am
  In January, the Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States concerning the pending cert petition in CNN, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:13 am by Adam Chandler
” Ruthann Robson of Constitutional Law Prof Blog notes that “[w]ithout much fanfare, President Obama signed into law the Animal Crush Video Prohibition Act of 2010, intended to cure the defects of the previous [animal cruelty] law, held unconstitutional last April in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As stated by the Second Department in Barnes v County of Nassau (108 AD2d at 54), the duty to care for the welfare of the children is imposed on the [municipality] by the State (Social Services Law §§395, 398), including the responsibility to place the children in foster homes or other institutions under proper safeguards (Social Services Law §398[6][g]), to supervise the children while in foster homes (Social Services Law §398[6][h]),… [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:57 am by Russ Bensing
Ice had implicitly overruled State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 11:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Lynch (Religious Freedom; Controlled Substances)Navajo Nation v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
" However the Court concluded that: "allowing the plaintiffs to use municipal funds, labor, and equipment for the nightly menorah lighting, even if the plaintiffs repaid the City for such labor and equipment, as required under the stipulation, would foster the perception of an unconstitutional excessive governmental entanglement with religion (see Walz v Tax Comm'n of City of New York, 397 US 664, 674; Citizens Concerned for Separation of Church & State… [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
However the Court concluded that: "allowing the plaintiffs to use municipal funds, labor, and equipment for the nightly menorah lighting, even if the plaintiffs repaid the City for such labor and equipment, as required under the stipulation, would foster the perception of an unconstitutional excessive governmental entanglement with religion (see Walz v Tax Comm'n of City of New York, 397 US 664, 674; Citizens Concerned for Separation of Church & State v City &… [read post]