Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 821 - 840 of 15,417
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2023, 7:13 am by Eric Goldman
Okularity * Copyright Plaintiffs Can’t Figure Out What Copyrights They Own, Court Says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ * A 512(f) Case Leads to a Rare Damages Award (on a Default Judgment)–California Beach v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:02 am by Ernie Svenson
I could have figured the progression out myself because I play guitar well enough to be able to figure out how to play songs by listening for the chord progressions. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 1:53 am by David Oxenford
 Under the Supreme Court’s NY Times v Sullivan precedent, the public figure must also show that the false content was broadcast with “malice,” i.e., knowledge that the claim was false or broadcasting it with reckless disregard for the truth. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:15 am by Jordan Schneider
v=E566LbON5QA Check out ChinaTalk.media for transcripts, analysis and more! [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
For example, a few journalists completely blew NFIB v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Late last week, Lachlan Murdoch dropped his defamation claim against key figures behind online publication Crikey. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 12:01 pm by Dennis Crouch
 I am also happy to work with any of you to help figure this out and reach a workable system that truly encourages innovation. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Good morning, Chairman McHenry, Ranking Member Waters, and members of the Committee. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:33 am by Neil Wilkof
Background Self Care sells anti-wrinkle cream products, including under the name PROTOX (see below, figure 1), and packaging that describes the product as an “instant Botox alternative” (see below, figure 2). [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 5:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
” This rule was developed and applied by the Second Circuit in its 2022 decision in Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  During an oral argument at the Supreme Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch initiated this bizarre exchange, as reported in Slate:During oral arguments in 303 Creative v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:13 am by Tom Smith
Supreme Court, the Justices might have reconsidered their 1964 precedent in New York Times Co. v. [read post]