Search for: "Flood v. State" Results 821 - 840 of 2,432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2017, 1:15 pm by Steven Cohen
City of Federal Heights – United States District Court – District of Colorado – October 31st, 2017) involves the rehabilitation of mobile homes after a flood. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:41 pm by Ilya Somin
In its unanimous decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 7:06 am by Drew York
The Texas Supreme Court, in the narrowly decided case of Harris County Flood Control District and Harris County v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 1:59 pm by Guest Author
However, if a fire, flood, earthquake, or other emergency makes the usual meeting place unsafe, the Board President is authorized to designate another meeting place for the duration of the emergency. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 1:59 pm by Guest Author
However, if a fire, flood, earthquake, or other emergency makes the usual meeting place unsafe, the Board President is authorized to designate another meeting place for the duration of the emergency. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
This summer, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in the Google Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am by Miriam Seifter
Over 100 parties flooded the courts with challenges to the rule, leading to a nationwide stay. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
See id.; see generally Cox Operating, L.L.C. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:31 am by Maseeh Moradi
Green Bay Co., 80 U.S. 166 (1872). [4] United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:14 pm by David Graeler
My search revealed an unpublished decision that came out yesterday (September 7, 2017) called Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:14 pm by David Graeler
My search revealed an unpublished decision that came out yesterday (September 7, 2017) called Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 6:33 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case asks the Second Circuit to get around that exemption, but the Circuit will not do so.The case is Wyckoff v. [read post]