Search for: "GAMBLE v. GAMBLE" Results 821 - 840 of 2,393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2017, 4:30 am by Ben
Wikipedia says ten and a half billion of the stamps were produced.A photographer is suing consumer products giant Procter & Gamble in the US, accusing the corporation and the world’s largest advertiser of not paying her for photos that have appeared on Olay packaging and marketing materials used around the world. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Canada’s Supreme Court orders Google to de-index unlawful websites globally https://t.co/sgFzLv3CUj -> National Courts and the Future of the Internet: Google Inc. v. [read post]
The key legal battleground in this case will be the Court’s interpretation of PAPSA under the controlling precedent of New York v. [read post]
The key legal battleground in this case will be the Court’s interpretation of PAPSA under the controlling precedent of New York v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 8:46 am by Joy Waltemath
Affirming the decision of the court below, the appeals court also found that his employer did not waive its right to arbitration by participating in the litigation of the merits of the case after its motion to compel arbitration had been preliminarily denied (Burch v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal will consider whether an implied term not to cheat in a gambling contract is only breached where there is dishonesty. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
 As the judge noted, both issues are interconnected and the second cannot succeed if infringement is found.Legal principles for registered designsMr Justice Carr reminded everyone of the guidance from Procter & Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Limited [2007] EWCA Civ 936; [2008] Bus LR 801 and repeated and expanded by the Court of Appeal in Dyson Ltd v Vax Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1206; [2013] Bus LR 328.In particular:(i) Registered design cases are concerned… [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
 As the judge noted, both issues are interconnected and the second cannot succeed if infringement is found.Legal principles for registered designsMr Justice Carr reminded everyone of the guidance from Procter & Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Limited [2007] EWCA Civ 936; [2008] Bus LR 801 and repeated and expanded by the Court of Appeal in Dyson Ltd v Vax Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1206; [2013] Bus LR 328.In particular:(i) Registered design cases are concerned… [read post]