Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 821 - 840
of 67,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 3:37 am
[t]he declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is...inconsistent with the declarant's testimony, and was given under... [read post]
A Is For Apple: ND Cal Finds Former Testimony Inadmissible Against Apple In Patent Infringement Case
1 Feb 2011, 7:11 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(1) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Testimony given as a witness at another hearing of the same or a different proceeding, or in a deposition taken in compliance with law in the... [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 5:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
Given the decisions regarding Same Sex Marriage handed down by the Supreme Court of the United States in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:35 am
Given the current makeup of the U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 5:05 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Magnus v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:02 pm
Exchange and Holocher v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 6:39 pm
Starbucks, which has given employers a glimmer of hope in this difficult wage and hour area. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 11:30 am
The Third Circuit this week, in U.S. v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:36 pm
The subject has been much on my mind in the last two or three days while reading and commenting on Town of Greece v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 10:09 am
For example, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:19 am
Always a fan of a case management decision, the AmeriKat was interested to see the decision in Celltrion Inc. v Biogen Idec Inc., F. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:01 am
Termination by operation of lawMaldarelli v Doherty, 7 A.D.3d 384In some instances a public officer or employee otherwise entitled to a pretermination hearing before he or she may be dismissed is automatically removed from his or her position by operation of law without being given any "notice and hearing. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:36 am
The models most relevant to the Amgen case are ones that incorporate a first-mover advantage, because Krystexxa and Tepezza both are the first drugs to treat their given conditions. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 11:43 am
(See Sgouros v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:21 pm
From the start to the farewell - well almost, the jury's still out as of this writing - Pattis has given us a unique look at ... [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:51 am
That was actually the most definitive answer given in the Supreme Court’s decision on Monday in Graham v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 5:26 am
United States v. [read post]
