Search for: "Goldstein v Held"
Results 821 - 840
of 886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2009, 5:09 pm
"New York appellate court upholds Atlantic Yards taking - Goldstein v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
In Van Devent v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 8:48 am
The Scotus Wiki page for Cone v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:00 pm
Yesterday the Court agreed to consider this question in No. 08-1065, Pottawattamie County, Iowa v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 9:01 am
Van de Kamp v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 3:33 am
An earlier constitutional objection to the public use of the taking was rejected in Goldstein v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
Tritek Telecom v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
Last year we reported on the case of Goldstein v Pataki, 516 F3d 50 [2008] involving the proposed condemnation of property in Brooklyn, New York in order to build the so called Atlantic Yards Project which includes a huge residential and commercial development along with an arena for the New Jersey Nets. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:21 am
Last year we reported on the case of Goldstein v Pataki, 516 F3d 50 [2008] involving the proposed condemnation of property in Brooklyn, New York in order to build the so called Atlantic Yards Project which includes a huge residential and commercial development along with an arena for the New Jersey Nets. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
Aug. 24, 2007); Goldstein v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
Aug. 24, 2007); Goldstein v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
Aug. 24, 2007); Goldstein v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 9:58 am
., v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 10:41 pm
The individual is dog meat.Van de Camp v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 7:21 am
The Court has released the opinion in Van de Kamp v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:02 pm
Earlier this morning, the Supreme Court held in Herring v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Don't ask us why, but that's what the court held in Duquette v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
As the student post has described, the 9th Circuit recently held in Betz v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:44 am
In Van de Kamp v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:10 pm
The court therefore held Jimenez's federal claim was time barred. [read post]
