Search for: "Greenhouse v. Greenhouse" Results 821 - 840 of 2,364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2007, 1:38 pm
In today's New York Times, Linda Greenhouse has this article on yesterday's argument in Winkelman. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:43 pm by Dianne Saxe
It will also give important support to plaintiffs in climate change litigation, such as Connecticut v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 3:06 pm
Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development v. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 4:43 am
When it comes to global warming, we have had far too much of that approach already.More on the global warming case, Mass. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:19 am
Supreme Court's remarkable 2007 decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 12:32 pm
Goodyear here, and Linda Greenhouse of the New York Times has her article about that argument here. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:08 pm by Raj Chohan
Times; Jess Bravin and Ann Zimmerman have this piece in the Wall Street Journal; Adam Liptak and Steven Greenhouse file this report in the New York Times. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 7:39 am by Kali Borkoski
., the State and Local Legal Center will host a webinar on last Term’s Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 6:40 pm
The chattering classes obsess about greenhouse emissions. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 4:33 pm
Supreme Court's decision last year in Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:00 am by Penn Program on Regulation
 See related RegBlog post.The EPA released a report detailing the costs and benefits of the Clean Air Act between 1990 and 2010.In Williamson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:00 pm by David
  As an initial matter, TSCA “does not include chemical substances subject to other US statutes such as foods and food additives, pesticides, drugs, cosmetics, tobacco, nuclear material, or munitions.” Greenhouse gases are indeed subject to other U.S. statutes (i.e. the Clean Air Act); this was the gravamen of the Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:32 pm by Bridget M. Lee
  Although the Fourth Circuit’s decision did not involve claims relating to greenhouse gas emissions, a recent petition for certiorari challenging the Second Circuit’s common law nuisance findings with respect to greenhouse gas emissions cited North Carolina v. [read post]