Search for: "HOLDER v. BANKS" Results 821 - 840 of 1,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2009, 9:58 am
ATTORNEY'S FEES, SECURITIES LAW Trust for the Certificate Holders of the Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:10 am by Randall Reese
 The companies, which are 85% owned by affiliates of Wind Point Partners, reported in court filings that they've reached an agreement with holders of a majority of both their first lien and second lien debt to reduce their current $252 million in debt by approximately $140 million. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:27 am by malik11397
First National Bank of Lake City, , 81 So. 2d 486, (Fla., 1955) Tamiami Abstract and Title Company v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 2:04 pm by Anna Christensen
Espinosa relies on Traveler's Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Appeals Class Actions: Limitation Periods & Related IssuesCanadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The Blog considered the ongoing case of Strike 3 Holdings in its efforts to subpoena the identity of an ISP holder in order to serve a claim against hm. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:00 am by NRF Digital Team
 The court emphasised the general principle that a company concerns itself only with registered holders of its shares. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 7:35 pm
., stock splits); (v)  shares issued in connection with a registered public offering; (vi)  shares issued or issuable pursuant to an acquisition of another corporation or a joint venture agreement approved by the board; (vii)  shares issued or issuable to banks, equipment lessors or other financial institutions pursuant to debt financing or commercial transactions approved by the board; (viii)  shares issued or issuable in connection… [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 2:58 am
Had plaintiff acquired the property through foreclosure, for example, the taxes still would have had to be satisfied, the Carney debt would have been eliminated and, as such, so would any damages to plaintiff stemming from defendants' alleged malpractice (see Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v Roslyn Estates, Inc., 266 App Div 244, 248-249 [1943], affd 293 NY 680 [1944]). [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 12:25 am by Donald Dinnie
When the insurer submitted the monthly debit order to the bank for payment the order was returned unpaid with the remark “payment stopped by account holder”. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:34 am by David Post
The Ninth Circuit gutted the red flag doctrine in Perfect 10 v. [read post]