Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 821 - 840
of 3,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2011, 5:39 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm
In her concurrence, Justice Ginsburg cited to the proposition that “lawfully made under this title” must mean “lawfully made in the United States,” as it is found in §109 of the Act. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:18 am
The state of affairs in the first Apple v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:00 pm
Kraft Foods Group Brands, No. 16-341, the United States Supreme Court significantly changed the geography where future patent infringement suits can be filed. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:00 pm
Kraft Foods Group Brands, No. 16-341, the United States Supreme Court significantly changed the geography where future patent infringement suits can be filed. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm
George, for Plaintiff-Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.Before: SMITH, BARKSDALE, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.STEPHEN A. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 4:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:17 am
Answer: No, according to Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division Three, in Parks v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Inc. of Palo Alto, California, the United States of America, represented by Heller Ehrman LLP, the United States of America. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:07 am
The style of the case is, Nautilus Insurance Company v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 4:35 pm
The Copyright Act provides that "no civil action for infringement of the copyright in any United States work shall be instituted until pre-registration or registration of the copyright claim has been made in accordance with this title. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:40 am
They contend that Congress gave the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and National Governing Bodies (NGB)—like USA Cycling—exclusive jurisdiction over eligibility for competitions. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
Holder, No. 10-545. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:47 am
This term, for instance, the Supreme Court is also considering the meaning of “accrues” in the context of suing the United States government in a case known as Corner Post, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
United States, 10-7515, for United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
In United States Patent and Trademark Office v Booking.com BV, the court upheld a Fourth Circuit decision stating that simply adding a top-level domain to a generic term does not render the mark generic in its entirety. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am
Holder (2013) as an egregious instance when Republican judges helped Republican political fortunes, but not Janus v. [read post]
