Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 821 - 840
of 7,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2010, 6:34 am
I actually am not sure that a short moratorium on housing foreclosures would be such a bad thing, and that's what the report recommends, at least in between the lines of urging Treasury to take a close look at the issue (the counterargument is that it would push banks back to insolvency, if they are getting no return on their underwriting, and that's not a bad argument either). [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:31 am
I don't think it's even a close call. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm
Any disclosure of privileged information or protected information should be done with care and in close coordination with the government. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Layman v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:51 am
In Bush v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 3:33 pm
Further, while child related benefits might be ‘designed to meet the needs of the child’ (R (SG and Others)) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [ 2015 ] UKSC 16 ), this could include the child’s housing costs. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm
[But how close is close enough? [read post]
24 Aug 2024, 11:51 am
Case Citation: Nicholas Services, LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:17 am
The family returned to New York in August of 2011, and promptly signed a one-year lease on a house. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 1:21 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
That is, 90% of branded pharmaceutical revenue was sourced from drugs that pharmaceutical firms invented “in house. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
” Payton v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 10:05 am
Bevilacqua v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 11:49 am
Mrs Beech’s parents had been joint tenants of a 3 bedroom property at 31 Tilshead Close, Birmingham since 1967. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 11:49 am
Mrs Beech’s parents had been joint tenants of a 3 bedroom property at 31 Tilshead Close, Birmingham since 1967. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
Earl Cadogan and other v Pitts and another; Earl Cadogan and another v Sportelli and another [2008] UKHL 71 Enfranchisement is the process whereby leaseholders can force their freeholder to sell them the freehold of the property. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 7:37 am
Simcox v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:38 am
What is the difference between, on the one hand, Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd v Cobbe [2008] UKHL 55 and, on the other hand, Thorner v Majors [2009] UKHL 18? [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 7:52 am
But that degree of conflict does not come close to the witnessed abuse in Walsh v. [read post]
