Search for: "IN RE BROWN MINORS"
Results 821 - 840
of 929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2008, 8:40 pm
See, this is where the rubber meets the road if you're Judge Kevin Emas. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
McCamish, Martin, Brown & Loeffler v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
" Polanski fled the country after he was convicted of having sex with a minor. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 9:01 pm
" Concerned that this position might be seen as contradicting his prior statements that he considered the same-sex marriages already performed to remain valid, Brown added a footnote stating that nothing in his response "should be construed to suggest that the Attorney General questions the validity of any same-sex marriage that occurred after the effective date of this Court's decision in In re Marriage Cases, but before November 5, 2008. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:14 pm
By a 3-2 majority their Lordships (Lords Hope, Carswell and Brown) held that she was not habitually resident (Baroness Hale and Lord Neuberger dissenting). [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Brown, 913 F.Supp. 260, 270-71 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (same); Harrison v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 9:06 pm
November 3, 2008 Re: Bring Back Bump Elliott. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 10:20 am
The view near the Hilton hotel-- I think the tall building on the left is an office buildings, while the brown one in the middle is apartments-- One of the area's two museum-ships. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
Bankruptcy Court - Lexington 08b0016p.06 In re: James Setters v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Smartly, Eisenhower maintained the New Deal policies and supported civil rights, including the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, October 14, 2008 Brown v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:01 pm
He conceded, in general, that voting support from whites might grow so great that Section 2 would not require a correction to favor minority voters, but said “we’re not there yet. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Bissonnette, No. 081094 In a conviction for first degree murder, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that: 1) the trial judge's instruction to the jury that the prosecution "does not have the burden of proving that no one else may have committed the murder" was an error that was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent as stated in In re Winship; and 2) the trial court violated defendant's Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 5:01 am
We're unlikely to find out because there is a publication ban to protect the minor's identity. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1351 n.2 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 3:42 pm
She called the decision of the Alaska Supreme Court, declaring a parental notification bill unconstitutional, "outrageous" and ordered the Attorney General to file papers for a re-hearing. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, September 22, 2008 Brown v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 6:01 am
Inasmuch as a couple of the Cowboys' receivers who made the final roster are dealing with minor injuries, Amendola has a good chance of being activated off of the practice squad for the Cowboys opener this week against this Browns at Cleveland. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Brattain, No. 07-1594 A sentence for aggravated sexual abuse of a minor is vacated and remanded for resentencing where, contrary to the district court's conclusion, the district court's refusal to apply an enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. section 4B1.5(b) was error because defendant qualified as a repeat offender, and Congress explicitly revised the enhancement to apply to repeat-offenders who abuse only a single victim. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:03 am
And if you’re happy in your bubble why burst it, right? [read post]
