Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF J. A. C." Results 821 - 840 of 5,635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2021, 5:52 pm
UN Peacekeeping, Terrorism, and Civil War Negotiations Rachel Schmidt, Contesting the Fighter Identity: Framing, Desertion, and Gender in Colombia Robert U Nagel, Conflict-Related Sexual Violence and the Re-Escalation of Lethal Violence Austin C Doctor, Foreign Fighters and Conflict-Related Sexual Violence Alke Jenss, Benjamin Schuetze, Rethinking Authoritarian Power: The Logistics Space and Authoritarian Practices in and between Secondary Port Cities of the Global South Tyler Pratt,… [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:33 am
 (j) Whether the principal is or is not in business. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 11:46 am by Unknown
(c) The association must deliver a ballot to every unit owner with the notice. [read post]
7 May 2021, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
R.C.P. 1006(a)(1) and (c)(2), it is provided that a malpractice case may be brought in a county where the cause of action arose and that an action asserting joint and several liability against multiple Defendants may be filed in any county where venue may be laid against any Defendant. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:22 am by WSLL
Rossetti, Deputy Attorney General; Michael J. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The district court granted judgment on the pleadings to defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), concluding that (1) it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Doherty’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief since they were moot, and (2) Doherty failed to state a claim for damages because emotional distress damages are not available under Title II of the ADA after the Supreme Court’s decision in Cummings v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   A factual distinction between these two cases is that, in Reifer, there was no pending parallel state action, as was the case in the matter of State Auto vs. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The district court granted judgment on the pleadings to defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), concluding that (1) it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Doherty’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief since they were moot, and (2) Doherty failed to state a claim for damages because emotional distress damages are not available under Title II of the ADA after the Supreme Court’s decision in Cummings v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:00 am
LZ Holding Pennsylvania, LLC, No. 1500-CV-2022 (C. [read post]