Search for: "In Interest of LJ"
Results 821 - 840
of 980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On the same day, judgment was handed down by Warby LJ in the appeal Riley v Sivier [2023] EWCA Civ 71. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
Joshua Rozenberg interviewed Lord Justice McFarlane on adoption for BBC Radio 4 Law in Action (following the recent inaugural Bridget Lindley memorial lecture) Fascinating interview by @JoshuaRozenberg with McFarlane LJ on #adoption: https://t.co/bw5rSdumIK; see further eg https://t.co/hRyHqWs22q. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:08 pm
• The approach of the English judiciary to corporate corruption In Innospec, Thomas LJ indicated criminal sanctions would be the most appropriate penalty in cases of serious corruption: “It will rarely be appropriate for crimina [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
LJ (we never blogged it), Zazzle. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 5:29 am
His reasons on the second are the most interesting. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:26 am
Of interest, the claimant also argued a second basis - that section 100 of the Patents Act 1977 applied. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
The German medicines authority did not accept that MSD had filed a valid application until 13 February 2014 (another interesting inclusion, muses Merpel....). [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:05 pm
Who wants a device devoid of access to interesting content? [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Lilly argued, and the judge accepted, that the skilled psychopharmacologist would read the Wong citation referenced in Gehlert because Professor Wong was well known in the field; the title of the paper would attract interest and was the only paper that referred to atomoxetine (this is relevant later). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm
Secondly, the opinion must be on a matter of public interest. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
There is an interesting legal and cricketing commentary on the Defamation Watch blog. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
The case considered the application of s.4 Defamation Act 2013 that publication was in the public interest. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
It may be that since the Supreme Court’s own ruling in ZH (Tanzania) the Abdulaziz principle cannot apply to cases where children are involved since their “best interests” must prevail (see our previo [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
The case had attracted significant interest domestically and internationally, with the claimant supported by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, and the Secretary of State for Transport intervening on his behalf. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
Interestingly, the Queen’s Bench Divisional Court (Fulford LJ and Leggatt J) permitted a McKenzie Friend, Dr Michael Pelling, to make representations on his behalf. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
In the same newspaper Michaela Whitbourn notes that the NSW led review of Australia’s defamation laws will examine “unreasonable limits” on public interest reports. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
There was a news item about the case on the 5RB website On the same day Haddon-Cave LJ refused permission to appeal in the case of Burgon v NGN. [read post]
30 May 2013, 4:00 am
Law schools should therefore educate law students to adapt to complexity and change, and to embrace and promote change that is in the public interest. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
This does not seem desirable in the interests of justice. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
In particular, it can impose a specific behaviors to one of the private parties of the deal, or require a legislative intervention in order to accommodate the interest of private parties. [read post]
