Search for: "In Interest of Wagner" Results 821 - 840 of 1,133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 5:16 pm by Shahram Miri
For instance, if you own a home in joint tenancy, your interest in the home automatically transfers to the surviving joint tenant upon death by operation of law. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
June 15, 2011 Adam Wagner When to prosecute children for sexual abuse June 15, 2011 Matthew Flinn Abduction and the child’s “best interests” – analysis June 14, 2011 Rosalind English News: Joshua Rozenberg Interviews Mr Justice Eady June 14, 2011 1 Crown Office Row Nature: give it a right or put a price on it? [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:59 am by Robert Wagner
by: Robert Wagner, intellectual property attorney at Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton, P.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:22 am by John McFarland
" "The Opinion analyzes the accrual issue in terms of 'Wagner's adverse possession cause of action.' But Wagner has no 'adverse possession cause of action.' Nobody does. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:26 pm by Will Aitchison
I still remember a Michael Musmanno opinion from law school – it dealt with post-contract oral modification: “[t]here is nothing sacrosanct about a written agreement … The most ironclad written contract can always be cut into by the acetylene torch of parol modification supported by adequate proof … The hand that pens a writing may not gag the mouths of assenting parties …” Wagner v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:36 am by Robert Wagner
by: Robert Wagner, intellectual property attorney at Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton, P.C. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:12 am by Charon QC
   Adam Wagner noted : “According to The Telegraph, the Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge is expected to issue “tough new” guidelines on internet use by jurors. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:09 pm by Robert Wagner
by: Robert Wagner, intellectual property attorney at Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton, P.C. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am by Graeme Hall
Interesting comments by Court of Appeal on meaning of “public interest”. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm by Dave
  Both Claimants were represented by the CAB, so a major hat tip (if that’s possible) to them for running these interesting appeals. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:15 am by Máiréad Enright
It will be interesting to see which line of reasoning the Supreme Court follows. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:57 am by Blog Editorial
Update: Adam Wagner asked Who should appoint our top judges? [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:39 am by Graeme Hall
June 3, 2011 David Hart QC Blogging (and maybe tweeting) should be part of Continuing Professional Development June 3, 2011 Adam Wagner Panorama at Winterbourne Park: the human rights angle – Lucy Series June 3, 2011 1 Crown Office Row The Adoption Dilemma: the rights of parents v child’s interests June 2, 2011 Rosalind English And about time for rights to nature? [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 10:43 am
Wagners has commenced a national-level class action, representing the interests of all Canadians who have consumed Avandia. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Buce
But once you think about it, you realize Wagner just isn't as interesting as the Greeks. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am by Graeme Hall
If you are interested in specialist courts, see Adam Wagner’s post from September on mental health courts. [read post]
27 May 2011, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
And as many commentators have glibly reminded us, what the public is interested in is not the same as what is in the public interest. [read post]