Search for: "JOHN DOE #2"
Results 821 - 840
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2016, 5:53 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 3:16 am
The inclusion of the generic term COFFEE in applicant's mark does not alter the Section 2(e)(2) analysis. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:48 am
For example, the downloads were often weeks or months apart: even assuming that the John Does are the actual infringers, the assertion that defendants were acting in concert rests upon a thin reed. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 2:19 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 4:19 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:12 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 10:23 am
So what does Edwards have to support his claim? [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:56 am
John Welch has posted a collection of “false connection” claims under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. 1052(a)). [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:10 am
No connection John Welch has posted a collection of “false connection” claims under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. 1052(a)). [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:58 am
I wrote a paper about these hurdles (here) in 2004.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 1:39 pm
Molly Rusten and Peter Rosen 2. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 2:31 am
"And so the Board affirmed the refusal to register under Sections 1, 2, and 45.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
., and Thomas John Kunkel, M.D., and West Chester Medical Center et al., 2016-0636. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:15 am
Does it make us more willing to regulate advertising, and in what ways? [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:01 am
A recent audit, released by City Comptroller John Liu, announced these discoveries after a 2-year-old Bronx child nearly died from falling from a 5th floor window without window-guards. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
-Senior Counsel, Kohrman, Jackson & KrantzI had a law school professor that would often proffer the following two theories to rationalize court decisions (especially ones he seemingly did not understand): 1) the justices did not “get any”…. breakfast that morning; and 2) the government always wins. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
-Senior Counsel, Kohrman, Jackson & KrantzI had a law school professor that would often proffer the following two theories to rationalize court decisions (especially ones he seemingly did not understand): 1) the justices did not “get any”…. breakfast that morning; and 2) the government always wins. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 2:41 pm
What Does It Do? [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:25 pm
I claim the doctrine of separability and the distinction between substantive and procedural arbitrability should be abolished, and that this amendment does so. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am
. - As does happen, The Prof can flub. [read post]
