Search for: "John Does 1-30" Results 821 - 840 of 3,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2017, 10:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Causation is required by the Lanham Act, but “that does not speak to whether and under what circumstances that element can be satisfied by a presumption. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But LaCroix’s book does that too, and does it beautifully. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
The fact that the 30 percent expressed their desire prior to the coverage does not clearly invalidate their desire. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:59 am by Dennis Crouch
Here, the ANDA documents are clear that the product does not infringe. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I would like to thank John for allowing me to publish his guest post on this site. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 1:33 am
The ten percent undecided will break for Obama 5 or 6 or 7 to 1. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:51 pm by Bridget Crawford
., and the President of that company (in his personal capacity), as well as John and Jane Does 1-10 who are corrections officers at the jail or members of the county jail’s medical staff. [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:11 am
Nevertheless, the focus of the week remains on the Derby and nowhere else does an entire city talk about thoroughbreds for as long or as much as Louisville does during Derby Week.It's a part of that discussion that caught my eye this week. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:55 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
When does Legal Pluralism enhance, when does it erode Legitimacy of and Trust in Democratic Institutions? [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 12:56 pm by Steve Hall
Earlier coverage begins with news of John Bradley's stalled nomination. [read post]
Both the Proud Boys and The Oath Keepers organizations are named defendants, as well as 18 individual Proud Boys members, 13 individual Oath Keepers members and 50 Jane/John Does allegedly affiliated with the organizations. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Hayley Evans, Paras Shah
On June 24, 2019, some of the victims (known as Victims Group 1, or LRV1) submitted an appeal brief; other victims (Victims Groups 2 and 3, or LRV2 and LRV3) submitted their brief by corrigendum, an error to be corrected after initial publication, of Sept. 30; and the first victims submitted an updated appeal brief by corrigendum of Oct. 2. [read post]