Search for: "Johnson v. State of California" Results 821 - 840 of 1,507
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2014, 4:24 am by David DePaolo
So if a doctor said it was necessary then it was...Now, the First District Court of Appeals for California has agreed to hear a constitutional challenge to the IMR process.A date and time for the oral argument in Stevens v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
In 1913, California was one of the first States to prohibit the sale and possession of marijuana, and at the end of the century, California became the first State to authorize limited use of the drug for medicinal purposes. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:38 am by Morin Jacob
Superior Court (Johnson) considered the interplay between the United States Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:01 am by Dustin Dow
  In Concepcion, the Supreme Court held that the FAA policy favoring arbitration preempted contrary California state common law barring class-action waivers. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 12:15 pm
Johnson (Jerrold Elwin) [Automatic Appeal] (justice pro tempore to be assigned)2:00 P.M.(4) S214221 State of California ex rel. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:21 pm
In earlier posts in the series, I noted that Thomas’ deference to the use of racial classifications in the prison context in Johnson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
California, 14-5442, involved whether a state court reviewing a Batson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:07 am
Kende also suggests that Thomas’ deference to racial classifications by prison officials in Johnson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
After losing in the trial and appellate courts, petitioners seek cert. on the issue of “[w]hether the Commerce Clause allows California to impose a complete ban on the sale of wholesome USDA-approved poultry products from other States and countries … based solely on the agricultural methods used by out-of-state farmers who raise their animals entirely beyond California’s borders. [read post]