Search for: "Jordan v. State" Results 821 - 840 of 1,804
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2017, 2:42 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS, MATRIX
The Facts The appellant in this appeal, an Iraqi citizen, had left Iraq at the age of 12 and first resided in Jordan and then since 2000 in the UK. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 7:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Robert Loeb and Emma Kohse examined the first invocation of the state secrets privilege by the DOJ in the Trump administration in Salim v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Jordan Brunner
The alliance would initially include Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as well as Egypt and Jordan, with the United States providing military and intelligence support. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
In the Kentucky Law Journal, law student Jordan Shewmaker looks at Honeycutt v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:53 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta Jurecic posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
Teva v Gilead, Abraxis v Comptroller and Wobben v Siemens kick of 2017's patent casesGuest post from Steven Baldwin (Allen & Overy), summarizing 2017's recent patent decisions. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:33 am by Jordan Brunner
Federal Republic of Ethiopia that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act gives state-sponsored hackers immunity, while Emma Kohse discussed the history and current state of the ATS suit Salim v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:32 am by Jordan Brunner
Peter Margulies examined Judge Gorsuch’s misplacement of his characteristic empathy in Kerns v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:04 am by Jordan Brunner
  Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
Seeking an ArrowArrow declarations can be granted: Fujifilm v AbbVieGuestKat Eibhlin Vardy discusses Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Co., Ltd v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd & Anor [2017] EWCA Civ 1, which involves two appeals, both raising the question of whether a Court can grant a so called ‘Arrow declaration’, i.e. a declaration that “a product was old or obvious in patent law terms at a particular date”.Guest Post - China's Patent BoomYangjin Li… [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:32 am by Kevin Johnson
He contended that the vagueness doctrine applies to the immigration laws, as clearly held by Jordan v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson
Dimaya contends that, in seeking to bar vagueness challenges to the immigration laws, the government is seeking nothing less than to overrule the court’s 1951 decision in Jordan v. [read post]