Search for: "M/V LORD"
Results 821 - 840
of 914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2009, 3:27 am
Finally, I’m not entirely convinced that this decision is compatible with Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin), discussed by us here. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 8:01 am
For further analysis see commentary by Steven M. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:22 pm
I’m not wholly surprised. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:22 pm
I’m not wholly surprised. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:34 am
As the Court said in Johnson v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 5:48 am
As Lord Scarman said in R v Home Secretary ex p. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Knowsley HT v White Lord Neuberger advances three reasons for an assured tenancy ending only with the execution of the order. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
Earl Cadogan and other v Pitts and another; Earl Cadogan and another v Sportelli and another [2008] UKHL 71 Enfranchisement is the process whereby leaseholders can force their freeholder to sell them the freehold of the property. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 8:24 pm
I’m very grateful. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 9:20 am
The case of KSJ v WRW [2008] EWCA Civ 1207 was reported yesterday on Bailli. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
R (RJM) (FC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63 This House of Lords judgment is now just under two weeks old, but I think it is still worthy of comment here. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 4:01 am
I’m not sure where I’m going with this though. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Reid and MacKinnon's checklist on protection of IPR in China (IP Dragon) China/Hong Kong: WIPO Copyright Treaty and WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty in effect in Hong Kong after PRC (IP Dragon) Protect your IP rights in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) Finland M&M and Taloustutkimus survey of most respected brands in Finland (Class 46) France Electronic filing of trade mark applications (Class 46) … [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 7:53 pm
I would suggest two initial responses: a) given the clear mess at a ECHR level and the odd finding of the House of Lords in the Animal Defenders case, I’m not sure how much scope there is to challenge the current position, and b) it may depend, as I’ve suggested below, on how far the enforcer goes in restricting political activities - where the broad interpretation of marketing includes both content as well as style, a freedom of expression-based challenge may… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 8:29 am
Regina (M) v Slough Borough Council House of Lords “A person's need for a refrigerator in which to keep his medication was not sufficient to entitle him to residential accommodation. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:26 am
This is from Peter V. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 12:48 am
(Opinion in USA v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:16 pm
But anyone who, like me, is a bit of an equity hobbyist on the side, the House of Lords judgment in Yeoman's Row Management Limited (Appellants) and another v Cobbe (Respondent) [2008] UKHL 55 is a must read on proprietary estoppel and constructive trust. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:18 am
R (on the application of M) (FC) (Respondent) v Slough Borough Council [2008] UKHL 52 is a House of Lords case concerning Local Authority obligations under the National Assistance Act 1948, and specifically when the authority is obliged to arrange and pay for accommodation. [read post]
