Search for: "MARTINEZ v. STATE" Results 821 - 840 of 1,777
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2013, 9:29 am by Steve Vladeck
As we noted in our argument preview, the Supreme Court held last Term in Martinez v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:51 am by Allison Trzop
Thaler, the Court held that when a state’s procedural framework makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise on direct appeal a claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, the good cause exception recognized in Martinez v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 6:25 am by David Oscar Markus
Thaler, in an opinion by Justice Breyer (but announced by Justice Kennedy, because Justice Breyer was absent), the Court held by a vote of five to four  that when a state’s procedural framework, by reason of its  design and operation, makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise on direct appeal a claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, the good cause exception recognized in… [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:42 am by Kali Borkoski
Thaler, in an opinion by Justice Breyer (but announced by Justice Kennedy, because Justice Breyer was absent), the Court held by a vote of five to four  that when a state’s procedural framework, by reason of its  design and operation, makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise on direct appeal a claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, the good cause exception recognized in Martinez… [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm by John Elwood
Cooper, 12-7516, out of the Fifth, raise nearly identical Cullen and Martinez v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Pennsylvania State Supreme CourtWebb v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am by Brian Shiffrin
In Illinois v Wardlow (528 US 119 [2000]), the United States Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, held that a person in a high crime area fleeing at the sight of police is, by itself, sufficient to create reasonable suspicion, under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]