Search for: "MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A J R" Results 821 - 840 of 1,716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 3:04 pm
Once again, the denial of what has brought matters to this point is astonishing. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A “Noting of loss of rights pursuant to R 112(1)” was issued by the Board on February 18, 2010. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 11:51 pm by Matthias Weller
 74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Cardoso, Connor J. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:34 am
It matters little whether the incidence of sex crimes is low; the public reacts to the danger they perceive. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am by Dennis Crouch
  Id. at 1330–31 (Moore, J.); see also id. at 1316–22 (O’Malley, J.) [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am by Andrew Dickinson
Owen J found that it did (see para. 30 of his judgment), but it may be doubted whether a scheme of this kind for compensating victims of anti-social conduct from public funds was intended to fall within the ambit of the Regulation. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm by Beth Van Schaack
  The event—co-hosted by IntLawGrrls, the Robert J. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 12:49 am by Matthias Weller
 74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Cardoso, Connor J. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
  First, it is important to point out that offenses that are more serious worsen the consequences of a wrongful conviction for the defendants.[13]  The presumption of innocence affirms that the State, with its great power and ability to denunciate and punish individuals depriving them of their liberty should access these powers once it has sufficient evidence to charge.[14]  An example of the dangers of the prosecutor’s role can be found in cases where it is argued that the… [read post]