Search for: "MATTER OF JAMES v. State" Results 821 - 840 of 4,138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2010, 3:44 am
Termination for cause may result in the loss of fringe benefits in retirementFarrell v City of Rensselaer, NYS Supreme Court, Justice James B. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 7:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
            In Matter of DiNunzio v Zylinski, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2019 WL 3955273, 2019 N.Y. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:33 am by Rosalind English
That court will only find that the state has acted in violation of A1P1 if it proceeded on the basis of a judgment in relation to action taken to promote a legitimate public interest which was “manifestly without reasonable foundation”: James v United Kingdom (1986) 8 EHRR 123. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm by Kevin Sheerin
”   ** Although it could be argued that the use of the word “State” limits the negotiation of alternative disciplinary procedures to the State and employee organizations representing State workers, in practice alternatives to statutory disciplinary procedures have been negotiated by political subdivisions of the State and employee organizations representing employees of such political subdivisions for decades. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 1:43 pm by Thomas James
The jury rendered a verdict in favor of Unicolor, but H&M moved for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 11:42 am by Robert George
The James Madison Program of Princeton University applauds the Supreme Court of the United States for rectifying a longstanding constitutional and moral atrocity. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
James (1972) (state college could not deny recognition of anti-war group based on group's association with national organization and fear of disruption on campus); Snyder v. [read post]