Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 821 - 840 of 5,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2007, 4:01 pm
Is Article 12(1) of Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks to be interpreted as meaning that there are proper reasons for non-use of a mark if the implementation of the corporate strategy being pursued by the trade mark proprietor is delayed for reasons outside the control of the undertaking, or is the trade mark proprietor obliged to change his corporate strategy in order to be able to… [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
The goods in question were premium-priced products, targeted at that niche group of consumers. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:22 pm
The Court of Justice of the European Union gave its ruling this morning in Case C? [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
Ergo, the Board affirmed this refusal.Mutilation: Under Rule 2.51(a), the mark shown on the application drawing must be a "substantially exact representation of the mark as used on or in connection with the goods and/or services. [read post]
30 May 2017, 2:58 am
" Judge Newman pointed to the TTAB's non-precedential opinion in In re Licores Veracruz, S.A. de C. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 6:36 am
 This was the question at the heart of the referral in AMS Neve, C-172/18, which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decided today. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:00 am by Anna Maria Stein
According to the Board of Appeal, the mark applied for was a promotional and complimentary message which emphasises the positive aspects of the goods and services concerned, namely their sustainability. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Bill C-56 would not allow border officers to seize goods for copyright or trademark infringement. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am by Laura Sandwell
The post In the Supreme Court w/c 25 November 2013 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am by Laura Sandwell
The post In the Supreme Court w/c 25 November 2013 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 1:00 am by Anna Maria Stein
   Previously, the applicant had also filed the figurative trade mark application no. 17976258 for the same goods covered by the position mark. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:23 am by Cameron Malone-Brown
Little time is wasted in stating that the acquisition of rights with no intention to use, and potentially to prevent third parties from using the mark in relation to these goods or services, will indeed constitute bad faith. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:40 am
A TTAB judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
However, now that it is heading on appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) as Case C-622/13 P, it has regained its pristine topicality -- so here it is.In April 2002 Castel Frères applied to register as a Community trade mark (CTM) the word CASTEL for ‘alcoholic beverages (except beers)’ in Class 33; the word was duly registered as a CTM. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
 In what reads like an angry professor marking an incompetent, but arrogant, student's exam paper Justice Scalia (who was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts) picks apart each of the Court's arguments. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:28 pm by David Klein
§ 1125(c)(3)(C), thus barring as a matter of law a claim of dilution by tarnishment under the Trademark Dilution Revision Act. [read post]