Search for: "Mark Harms"
Results 821 - 840
of 10,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2017, 3:02 am
The six mark/good combination used on defendants’ accused products were “identical to, or substantially indistinguishable from” the Claw Icon Mark. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 4:10 pm
As the New York Times notes, these filings mark the first time the government acknowledged that the NSA "started systematically collecting data about Americans’ e-mails and phone calls in 2001, alongside its program of wiretapping certain calls without warrants." [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:10 am
The court noted that infringement under section 34(1)(c) requires the applicant to establish that the use took an unfair advantage of the well-known mark or that the use occasioned substantial harm to the uniqueness and reputation of the well-known mark. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:52 am
“only once” and H.M.G. six times “with an open hand,” leaving “marks” on their “bare bottoms. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:27 am
Bad pun aside, Hewlett-Packard has sued its former CEO, Mark Hurd, who left HP last month and reportedly just joined Oracle as its new co-president. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 4:39 am
These principles are fine in theory, but in reality, you may just end up harming your client. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 11:25 am
They include:Politicians in poor countries who want to use claims of harm to their countries to get rich governments to give them money. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 am
In another case of first impression that involved yours truly, the Board ruled that Section 18 of the Lanham Act permits a petition for rectification of a color mark registration to limit the scope of the mark to the actual color in use. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
" [But if the buyers of one party's product are not buyers of the other party's product, what's the harm from this confusion? [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
Trade marks No License No Cry: Ninth Circuit Nixes Jammin Java Appeal in Bob Marley Trademark Case, on IPWatchdog, reports on the recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:00 am
Alvare, A 'Bare…Purpose to Harm'? [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 4:05 am
Keiser appealed, arguing that some degree of imagination is required to associate the mark with its services, and that competitors have no need to use the mark exact terminology in describing their own services. [read post]
15 May 2007, 1:41 pm
The real question is where does one draw the line - does one sit and watch while something that may cause harm in the future is allowed to contiune? [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 5:57 am
Living conditions marked by poverty, sociopolitical unrest, or community violence are insufficient to show grave risk of harm or intolerable situation. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 7:01 am
“[D]istinct evidence of harm” isn’t a prerequisite. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
Separately, plaintiffs didn’t show irreparable harm. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:11 am
Indianapolis; IN - Trademark attorneys for Dillinger, LLC of Mooresville, Indiana filed a complaint for injunctive relief and damages in alleging The Pour House on Lincoln, Inc. d/b/a Dillinger's Chicago Bar & Grill, Inc. of Chicago, Illinois infringed trademark registration nos. 3,483,359 for the mark DILLINGER'S and no. 4,091,160 for the mark PUBLIC ENEMY which have been registered by the US Trademark Office. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:33 am
Victims and their families who have been harmed by a DUI driver would be well advised to contact an experienced Long Beach DUI victims’ lawyer who will remain on their side, fight for their rights and help them receive maximum compensation for their losses. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Was Plaintiff harmed by the confusion? [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:14 am
Still, “Asiarim’s two-year campaign of intentional infringement and deceit” “certainly” caused more harm than that, given the proven value of the marks in the past and the lost ability to exploit the marks’ licensing potential. [read post]
