Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
United States, the justices ruled that co-conspirators who do not benefit personally from illegal proceeds cannot be ordered to forfeit property. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
These recommendations and challenges suggest that issues of corporate personality, of sovereign immunity, of asset partition, and of the mania for compartmentalization that marks certain approaches to global economic and financial regulation may well hobble the work of embedding human rights within the operation of states as owners and SOEs as public enterprises. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
He seeks to cripple the civilian agencies—the State Department, USAID, and the United States Institute of Peace—that consolidate combat success into political victory. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
Rather, the only parties that could bring the claim are the alien’s associates (relative or organization) within the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm
The State Department had in fact supported a waiver, but the Attorney General denied it, pursuant to his discretion under § 1182(d)(3)(A). [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
” Because the President’s travel ban is not “bona fide,” the court privileged cable news hits from Rudolph Giuliani and Stephen Miller over official statements of the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and State, to conclude that the policy was in fact animated by animus. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am
In marked departures from the original order, the revised E.O. clarifies that its provisions are restricted to those outside the United States who did not have a valid visa on or after January 27, 2017; permits consular officers to grant waivers on a case-by-case basis; eliminates the indefinite ban on Syrian refugees; and eliminates the preferential treatment provision. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:35 am
At Letters Blogatory, Ted Folkman looks at the decision, noting that the opinion puts the state and federal courts in the United States “on the same page with the Special Commission of the Hague Conference, the US State Department, most if not all foreign courts, and more or less all writers on the subject. [read post]
18 May 2017, 6:53 am
” United States v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:30 am
The revised EO applies only to noncitizen visa applicants with no previous ties to the United States—a group with scant, if any, statutory or constitutional rights. [read post]
11 May 2017, 10:46 am
On Wednesday, Trump met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey V. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm
The firing has spurred calls for the appointment of a special counsel at the Department of Justice to oversee the investigation. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am
It may have been a milestone in the life of the court – just like when the newest member of the cafeteria committee leaves his mark on the court’s menu (NB: Justice, you’ll get less ribbing for adding poutine if you call the dish “gravy cheese fries. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
” Even if Mandel does apply, the government’s insistence that the court not look behind the executive order’s text disregards the “bona fide” prong of the standard; as Justice Kennedy explained in his plurality opinion in Kerry v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:45 am
Data Privacy and Data Protection In the case of R (P) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 321, the Court of Appeal held that the revised statutory scheme for the disclosure of convictions required further amendment as its operation in individual cases remained deficient. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:21 am
Perhaps the Justice Department is considering revising this policy in the Assange case? [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:04 pm
United States, No. 16-309. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
United States, a unanimous court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:49 pm
United States). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am
Quinta examined whether the Justice Department just admitted doubts over Trump’s oath in its brief on appeal in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
