Search for: "Martin v. Martin"
Results 821 - 840
of 6,943
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2011, 3:16 pm
--Martin v PepsiAmericas, Inc., 5th Cir.: The 5th Circuit reiterated its bright-line rule that set-offs and counterclaims are not permissible in FLSA suits in holding that an employer may not set off the value of benefits that it paid out under a severance agreement against a claim for overtime wages under the FLSA. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 2:26 pm
Stanford student Martine Cicconi summarizes yesterday’s argument in Bobby v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:45 am
” Martin v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 3:22 pm
By Kevin Connolly On certified question from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Texas Supreme Court, in Fairfield Insurance Company v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 12:41 pm
In the ongoing litigation concerning the debarment of a civilian investigator from MCRD San Diego, the plaintiff’s lawyers filed this reply on Thursday. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:17 am
The California Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division One) issued this unpublished opinion yesterday, reversing a punitive damages award because the plaintiff failed to introduce sufficient evidence of the defendants' financial condition. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:29 am
While the trial of famous whistleblower Bradley Manning continues and the fate of even-more-famous whistleblower Edward Snowden remains unresolved, two other government employee whistleblowers involved in high profile cases have been terminated from employment and possibly implicate Garcetti v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:36 pm
[Martin v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
* Civil Service Law §200 et seq.** Martin v Curran did not involve a union member suing his union but was a libel action in which the president of one union sued another union for libeling him in its newspaper. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:56 pm
Even if two cases don't make a trend, there are two must-read posts for California litigators from Shaun Martin, whose blog, California Appellate Report, really is a must-read:Nazir v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 9:27 am
Martin v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 4:29 am
Board of Education) and, of course, Brown v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 5:21 am
Per Martin v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 3:39 am
Martin Assoc., Inc. v Illinois Natl. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
Martin, in which the Louisiana Supreme Court expressly adopted the U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 9:59 pm
Sienna Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:50 am
By Claire Gregg* and Martin O'Brien** -- The Full Federal Court of Australia has handed down its long awaited decision in D'Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc today, affirming that isolated DNA and RNA are patentable subject matter under Australian law. [read post]
29 Jul 2005, 3:17 am
Martin, Washington Supreme Court No. 74698-2. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:35 pm
Amerigen Pharmaceuticals Limited v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:59 pm
By Claire Gregg & Martin O'Brien -- Following the recent public consultation in view of the Australian High Court's decision in D'Arcy v Myriad Genetics ("Myriad"), IP Australia has released new Examination Guidelines for applications which may be affected by the decision. [read post]
