Search for: "May v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc." Results 821 - 840 of 866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2020, 9:09 am by Patrick T. Ryan
It then rejected the argument that nothing in Rule 23 prohibits a negotiation class as failing to recognize the Supreme Court’s guidance in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm by Greg Mersol
  Many of the court’s reasons sprang from the Supreme Court’s opinion in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Spencer: we don’t store health related information, though it may work differently for things like Gmail—he only works in one area. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, 2010 WL 419393, at *2-4 (M.D. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 10:46 am by Ronald F. Wick
The court further took issue with many of the plaintiffs’ suggested common issues of fact, drawing on the recent Supreme Court decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 7:47 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 7:07 am by Joy Waltemath
Noting that disparate impact claims under Title VII challenge “a facially neutral policy or practice that causes a disparate impact on a protected group, even if the employer has no intent to discriminate,” the court observed that Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 355 F.3d 1327, 1333 (Fed. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:21 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Supreme Court issued three class action rulings - in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:28 pm by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
  This case is significant because it is the first known California appellate decision reviewing a trial verdict in an overtime misclassification case, where the trial court employed one of the purported “innovative procedural tools” (statistical sampling) to manage class action trials referenced by the California Supreme Court in Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. [read post]