Search for: "Michael v. West" Results 821 - 840 of 1,238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kali Borkoski
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:26 am by Rob Robinson
(Part 1) http://bit.ly/vZBx4k (Tom Mighell) A Proposal for Preservation Rule Amendments - http://bit.ly/nQ7Jzq (William Wallace Belt) A World of Copyright Confusion on the Web - http://bit.ly/qpGVEW (Craig Smith) ABA Formal Opinion 11-460 is at Odds With Stengart v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:51 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- West Des Moines lawyer Steve Lombardi on his blog, The Iowa Edict [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:48 am by Jon
Massanari, 266 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2001), citing Anastasoff v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:41 pm by Karen Tani
Michael Zeuske, the University of Cologne, Germany. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:41 pm by Karen Tani
Michael Zeuske, the University of Cologne, Germany. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary contribution of its revenues… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary contribution of its revenues… [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Marie Louise
(IPBiz)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC reverses DNH in Markem-Imaje Corporation v Zipher; Newman partially dissents (IPBiz) District Court Nevada: Plaintiff need not produce licenses involving unasserted patents where licenses involving patents-in-suit have been produced: Bally Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]