Search for: "Minor v. State"
Results 821 - 840
of 14,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 8:39 pm
DISMISSED – Possession of Dangerous Drugs and Drug Manufacturing Equipment, State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 10:16 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 4:05 am
Supreme Court in Tingley v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:29 am
This is the case in which the Mississippi Supreme Court denied ERISA reimbursement, upholding state law prohibiting subrogation against a minor. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 6:10 am
Scott Greenfield details the disturbing Wisconsin Supreme Court case of State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 1:52 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Monday ruled unanimously [opinion, PDF] in Nichols v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 11:12 am
In a per curiam decision in (Derrick) Johnson v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:23 pm
The petition of the day is: Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:35 pm
Almost 50 years ago, Congress enacted the VRA to prevent state and local governments from adopting any new election laws aimed at keeping minorities from voting until they could prove that those laws would not discriminate. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:40 pm
DISMISSED – Conspiracy to Sell Dangerous Drugs, State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:42 am
The recent decision of Awalt v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 4:00 am
In a 2-1 decision in Matsumoto v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
By the Kean Miller State and Local Tax Team On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
Justice Emerson’s decision, which pre-figured by several years the Second Department’s landmark opinion in 1545 Ocean Avenue, held that Bonanni’s reliance on the grounds for dissolution available to oppressed minority shareholders under Business Corporation Law § 1104-a did not state a valid claim for relief under LLC Law § 702 governing judicial dissolution of LLCs. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 3:10 pm
Hurtado argues that the district court erred when it held that he was not entitled to the 'minor role' reduction provided for in United States Sentencing Guideline § 3B1.2(b).Hurtado’s argument is essentially this: Just as all children in Lake Wobegon are above average, all drug couriers are, by definition, below average and entitled to the minor role reduction. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:36 pm
The United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois has issued another opinion in the Noonan v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 9:57 am
In Jane Doe v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:22 am
The appellants argued specific statutory rights are not to be cut down by subordinate legislation passed under the vires of a different Act, a rule identified in the case of R v Secretary of State for Social Security, Ex p Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants [1997] 1 WLR 275 (“JCWI”). [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
It furthermore held that the authorities of the committees relied upon by the appellants was “slight” as a matter of international law, relying on Jones v Ministry of Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2007] 1 AC 270 at [23]. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:20 am
For those not tired of hearing me state it for the umpteenth time, the import of cases like Norvell is simple: before you acquire an LLC membership interest, and even more so if it’s a minority interest, get thee to a lawyer and make sure you get the protection you need in a sensible, written operating agreement. [read post]
