Search for: "Minor v. State"
Results 821 - 840
of 14,893
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2011, 6:42 am
The recent decision of Awalt v. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 7:38 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
Ginsberg v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 6:47 pm
Bond’s use of readily available toxic chemicals to achieve a “minor thumb burn. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
Justice Emerson’s decision, which pre-figured by several years the Second Department’s landmark opinion in 1545 Ocean Avenue, held that Bonanni’s reliance on the grounds for dissolution available to oppressed minority shareholders under Business Corporation Law § 1104-a did not state a valid claim for relief under LLC Law § 702 governing judicial dissolution of LLCs. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 3:10 pm
Hurtado argues that the district court erred when it held that he was not entitled to the 'minor role' reduction provided for in United States Sentencing Guideline § 3B1.2(b).Hurtado’s argument is essentially this: Just as all children in Lake Wobegon are above average, all drug couriers are, by definition, below average and entitled to the minor role reduction. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 9:57 am
In Jane Doe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:36 pm
The United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois has issued another opinion in the Noonan v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:17 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
It furthermore held that the authorities of the committees relied upon by the appellants was “slight” as a matter of international law, relying on Jones v Ministry of Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2007] 1 AC 270 at [23]. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:20 am
For those not tired of hearing me state it for the umpteenth time, the import of cases like Norvell is simple: before you acquire an LLC membership interest, and even more so if it’s a minority interest, get thee to a lawyer and make sure you get the protection you need in a sensible, written operating agreement. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:22 am
The appellants argued specific statutory rights are not to be cut down by subordinate legislation passed under the vires of a different Act, a rule identified in the case of R v Secretary of State for Social Security, Ex p Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants [1997] 1 WLR 275 (“JCWI”). [read post]
12 May 2017, 11:39 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:00 am
Turkey and S.A.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:03 pm
The ruling in Farrakhan v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:43 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
LS3, LLC v. [read post]
Bond v. United States: SCOTUS Interprets Criminal Statute Narrowly to Preserve Federal-State Balance
3 Jun 2014, 9:23 am
” Stenberg v. [read post]
