Search for: "NL" Results 821 - 840 of 1,254
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2011, 12:04 pm
Some Member States withdraw reception conditions in situations not authorised by the Directive (FI, DE, NL and some regions of AT). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
.* Furthermore, you have written in in your droves [cough splutter - NL] praising our innovative and revolutionary roundtable writing approach to these cases (as seen with Kay v UK and again with Manchester v Pinnock) so we have rolled it out again. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
.* Furthermore, you have written in in your droves [cough splutter - NL] praising our innovative and revolutionary roundtable writing approach to these cases (as seen with Kay v UK and again with Manchester v Pinnock) so we have rolled it out again. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:58 pm by Falk Metzler
Considering the fact that the London Agreement has already abolished translation requirements for most of the more important EPC/EU economies like UK, FR, DE, NL, SE, DK, huge cost savings due to reduced translation expenses cannot be expected, especially since the two most important countries that have not entered the London Agreement, namely Italy and Spain, will not participate in the EU patent either. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
A ce jour, deux décisions ont été prises par le Président :La décision du 5 octobre 2010 prévoit que la recherche antérieure est automatiquement versée au dossier dans le cas des recherches effectuées par l'OEB pour une demande prioritaire EP, PCT ou nationale (BE, CY, FR, GR, IT, LU, MT, NL, TR). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am by Dave
Background The background to Yemshaw has been covered by NL (here), which was concerned with the Court of Appeal judgment. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm by NL
London Borough of Hackney v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of an appeal on the issues raised in Forcelux v Binnie [2009] EWCA Civ 854 [Our report here], specifically the Court’s ability to set aside a possession order under CPR 3.1(2)(m) as opposed to the more restrictive provisions in CPR 39.3. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:48 pm by NL
London Borough of Hackney v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8 This was the Court of Appeal hearing of an appeal on the issues raised in Forcelux v Binnie [2009] EWCA Civ 854 [Our report here], specifically the Court’s ability to set aside a possession order under CPR 3.1(2)(m) as opposed to the more restrictive provisions in CPR 39.3. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
No team had dominated the NL for very long in the 1930’s, and four teams—the Cubs, Giants, Cardinals and Reds—had won pennants in that decade. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:43 am by NL
(Over 75% of rent of £90.94 per week) [NL- OMG. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:43 am by NL
(Over 75% of rent of £90.94 per week) [NL- OMG. [read post]