Search for: "Nelson v. State" Results 821 - 840 of 1,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
Mitchell    Northern District of Ohio at ClevelandKAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving a “meaty Speech or Debate clause” issue. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:39 pm by Lyle Denniston
Nelson, so that is the answer to both questions; and, second, federal courts have no jurisdiction to rule on matters of domestic relations, including marriage, so the regulation of marriage has to be left to the states to decide. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
They did so where the recount included some votes in the state and excluded others, a circumstance hardly likely to recur.Moreover, had there been an objection to the Florida electors presented to Congress, Bush v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 7:04 am
This upcoming week, the New York Court of Appeals will address the following certified question in Briggs Avenue LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 2:31 pm by Unknown
Local No. 105, 415 P.2d 855, 857 (Colo. 1966) (en banc); see also Nelson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:48 am by Dean
Next Thursday, November 5, the seven justices of the Minnesota Supreme Court will sit at the bench behind me to hear the criminal case of State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 9:09 am
Next Thursday, November 5, the seven justices of the Minnesota Supreme Court will sit at the bench behind me to hear the criminal case of State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” It was good enough for “separate but equal” segregation in many states up to the Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 3:51 am
Bailey    Eastern District of Tennessee at ChattanoogaCRIMINALKAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:34 am
Hunter also links to a San Francisco Chronicle article.10/14/09 LawDork, by attorney Chris Geidner:Walker stated that neither Romer v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court is "not bound to adhere to federal standing requirements" (US Bank N.A. v Nelson, 36 NY3d 998, 1003 n 4 [2020] [Wilson, J., concurring]), under New York law, plaintiffs must nevertheless demonstrate that they suffered an "injury in fact" (Matter of Mental Hygiene Legal Serv. v Daniels, 33 NY3d 44, 50 [2019] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]