Search for: "P. v. Smith" Results 821 - 840 of 1,941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
  To submit comments visit regulations.gov and search for docket number PTO-P-2024-0014. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:11 am
Smith, Assistant Attorney General. [read post]
20 May 2010, 4:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged in March about the court’s rejecting the religious accommodation claim in this case, but the court (in Jama v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 7:04 pm
Justice Smith’s remarks above, with the Court’s plea to the parties in Hansen v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:47 am by Richard Hunt
” The relevant regulations focus on communications services, and in Est. of Smith v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:42 pm by cdw
Since the last edition: In favor of an individual Leonard Edward Smith v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
When it considered the very same phrase in R v Salford Health Authority; Ex p Janaway [1989] AC 537, the House of Lords decided that “treatment” meant “the process of treatment in hospital for the termination of pregnancy” and “participate” meant “actually taking part in that process”. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am by admin
Smith   [Concluded from yesterday's Part 2 and the previous Part 1.] [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:55 am by Douglas Reiser
Attorney Jordan Foster, of Tacoma’s Smith Alling, contacted me shortly after I published our article on Gray v. [read post]