Search for: "PENN v. PENN." Results 821 - 840 of 1,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2012, 10:30 pm
 I said as much in a 1994 U Penn Law Review article, and since then the Supreme Court's docket has continued to shrink. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 7:47 am
Penn, 18C.M.A. 194, 199, 39 C.M.R. 194, 199 (1969)). [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 8:01 am by Alfred Brophy
 It wasn't long before Justice Thomas Ruffin's opinion in State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
., according to a story in today's Philadelphia Inquirer.Last January, in Rudovsky & Sosnov v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 1:14 pm
As always, please click on the PENNumbra link to read previous Responses and Debates, or to check out pdfs of the Penn Law Review's print edition articles. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Eric Claeys (George Mason/Scalia) on Penn Central v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:57 am by pittlegalscholarship
UCLA Richard Sander (UCLA Law) presents “The Misunderstood Consequences of Shelly v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 10:20 am by University of Pennsylvania Law Review
As always, please visit PENNumbra to read published Essays, Responses, and Debates, or to check out pdfs of the Penn Law Review’s print edition articles. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 2:03 pm
” Several blogs have done a good job summarizing the case, including the Employer Law Report and this summary from Littler: While the decision in 14 Penn Plaza L.L.C. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm by Solangel Maldonado
   He is the author of the forthcoming book, Loving v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 9:23 am by Alexandra Dunn
Through her litigation and advocacy she created many of the statutory and case law precedent that offered protection to historic buildings, including Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 1:56 pm by Jeff Sovern
In particular, the Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 11:45 am by Glen C. Hansen
Hansen then argues that legislative exactions that satisfy those two criteria also should not be governed by the ad hoc factored analysis in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]